Quote:
Originally Posted by DinoDanny
Oh boy! Here we go.
|
Nope, nope, not gonna do it.
I will say this (I think it's reasonable). People used to compare the ST1300 and the FJR (when both were fairly new) and say that both were very competent, capable sport tourers, but the FJR leaned more toward the sport side, and the ST leaned more toward the touring side of the sport/touring equation. Well now the tide has shifted a bit, and when comparing the FJR and the GTR, I would say that the GTR leans a bit more toward the sport side, and the FJR leans a bit more toward the touring side...between these two bikes. The FJR is sporty, but not as sporty as the GTR. I think the FJR has a slight advantage in the long range ergos department, but that's a VERY subjective thing! I believe by the numbers, the FJR is a little bit roomier, and has more ergonomic adjustability (seat and bars adjustable from the factory). Hard case capacity looks too close to call. In my oppinion, the FJR has a few nice touches that the GTR lacks, but they may not be important to you.
Best suggestion...look for an opportunity to spend a little time with both bikes and play with all the toys. Only you know which features and characteristics are most important to you. You really can't go wrong with either bike, you just need to decide for yourself which one YOU like better.
There...how was that??
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Uhjeen
I too was interested by the FJR but have read some very disapointing posts in FJR forums concerning the '07 model.
|
It's worth noting that alot of those issues (specifically, poor fuel delivery/hesitation at high altitude) have been addressed on the '08 models, plus some minor tweaks to the brakes, and transmission. There's also a recall now to replace ECUs in the '07 that have the problem.
Like I said in 'that other thread', the biggest advantage the competition has, is they've had more time to learn from their mistakes.